Czech vs Armenian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czech
Armenian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechs
Armenians
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,687
SOCIAL INDEX
54.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
170th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Armenian Integration in Czech Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 294,899,644 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Armenians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 7.5 Armenians.
Czech vs Armenian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 17.7%), per capita income ($44,595 compared to $48,287, a difference of 8.3%), and median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $42,212, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $61,656, a difference of 0.67%), median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $58,134, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $107,002, a difference of 3.4%).
Income Metric | Czech | Armenian |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,595 | Exceptional $48,287 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,839 | Exceptional $109,692 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,164 | Exceptional $91,807 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,221 | Exceptional $49,804 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,546 | Exceptional $58,134 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,992 | Exceptional $42,212 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,421 | Exceptional $53,179 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,525 | Exceptional $103,248 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,507 | Exceptional $107,002 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,244 | Good $61,656 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.2% | Exceptional 24.8% |
Czech vs Armenian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 37.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 7.5%).
Poverty Metric | Czech | Armenian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.8% | Good 12.1% |
Families | Exceptional 7.4% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Exceptional 9.8% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Good 13.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.9% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Excellent 11.1% |
Czech vs Armenian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.6%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Czech | Armenian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Czech vs Armenian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 32.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czech | Armenian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Fair 64.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.6% | Tragic 32.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.5% | Tragic 72.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Fair 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Fair 82.5% |
Czech vs Armenian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 16.5%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.16%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Czech | Armenian |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Average 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.4% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Good 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.9% | Average 46.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Exceptional 26.2% |
Czech vs Armenian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 36.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czech | Armenian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.3% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.5% | Excellent 56.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Good 19.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Excellent 6.6% |
Czech vs Armenian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 64.7%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Czech | Armenian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 94.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 92.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.6% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Good 86.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 68.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Exceptional 63.0% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.2% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Exceptional 42.3% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.7% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Czech vs Armenian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 50.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 48.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.7%).
Disability Metric | Czech | Armenian |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 24.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Tragic 50.0% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Average 3.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 3.4% |