Czech vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,849,797 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 9.9 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 25.4%), per capita income ($44,595 compared to $40,434, a difference of 10.3%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $51,594, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $38,833, a difference of 0.41%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $52,450, a difference of 2.0%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $83,304, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 50.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.10%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.4%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.9%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.0%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.74%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 48.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.46%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 134.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.7%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.9%).