Czech vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,756,527 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.178% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 177.5 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $83,937, a difference of 23.3%), per capita income ($44,595 compared to $36,651, a difference of 21.7%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $87,596, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $49,997, a difference of 2.9%), wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $34,960, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (9.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 65.8%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 62.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 60.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.1%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 55.9%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 46.7%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.9%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.8%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.18%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 68.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.67%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.5%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 25.7%), and bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 80.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 21.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.35%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and disability (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%).