Czech vs Lebanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 371,792,838 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Lebanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 8.2 Lebanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.7%), per capita income ($44,595 compared to $45,840, a difference of 2.8%), and median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $40,006, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $97,339, a difference of 0.84%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $107,086, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $104,734, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 34.1%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 20.7%), and family poverty (7.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.1%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.2%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.9%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.010%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.2%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.3%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.31%).