Czech vs Malaysian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czech
Malaysian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechs
Malaysians
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Malaysian Integration in Czech Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,579,381 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.519. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 29.8 Malaysians.
Czech vs Malaysian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 16.5%), per capita income ($44,595 compared to $39,194, a difference of 13.8%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $50,772, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $51,615, a difference of 0.38%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $37,298, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $58,244, a difference of 5.1%).
Income Metric | Czech | Malaysian |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,595 | Tragic $39,194 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,839 | Tragic $95,230 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,164 | Tragic $81,064 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,221 | Tragic $43,844 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,546 | Tragic $50,772 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,992 | Tragic $37,298 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,421 | Poor $51,615 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,525 | Tragic $88,291 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,507 | Tragic $94,517 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,244 | Tragic $58,244 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.2% | Excellent 25.0% |
Czech vs Malaysian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 37.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.1%), and family poverty (7.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 2.8%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
Poverty Metric | Czech | Malaysian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Families | Exceptional 7.4% | Poor 9.6% |
Males | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Good 19.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 18.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 17.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Tragic 22.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Czech vs Malaysian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.3%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Czech | Malaysian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 5.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.3% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Poor 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.5% |
Czech vs Malaysian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czech | Malaysian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Fair 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.6% | Exceptional 39.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.5% | Exceptional 77.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Tragic 82.0% |
Czech vs Malaysian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.4%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.2%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.31, a difference of 6.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Czech | Malaysian |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.4% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.9% | Poor 45.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Tragic 33.9% |
Czech vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.47%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 2.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czech | Malaysian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.5% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Czech vs Malaysian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 85.4%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Czech | Malaysian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 94.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 93.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 92.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 90.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Tragic 89.2% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.6% | Tragic 87.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Tragic 83.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 62.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Tragic 55.6% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.2% | Tragic 41.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Tragic 32.9% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Czech vs Malaysian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.59%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.98%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Disability Metric | Czech | Malaysian |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.5% |