Czech vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,629,591 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 10.4 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 27.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $91,385, a difference of 13.3%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $50,298, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $38,028, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $48,749, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $57,114, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 49.7%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 42.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.0%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.7%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.8%), married-couple households (49.4% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.7%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (64.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 51.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 19.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 14.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 110.7%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 37.5%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.9%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.7%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.3%).