Czech vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,912,027 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to a decrease of 2.6 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 39.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $92,208, a difference of 12.2%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $94,665, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $39,910, a difference of 2.4%), median earnings ($47,221 compared to $45,532, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $54,714, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 86.1%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 72.5%), and family poverty (7.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.9%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 49.0%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 47.1%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 45.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 21.7%), married-couple households (49.4% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), family households (64.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 274.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 88.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 79.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 25.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 58.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 79.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 110.8%), college, under 1 year (67.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 0.42%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 81.8%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.9%), female disability (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.7%).