Czech vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,369,562 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 34.0 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 11.0%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $40,977, a difference of 5.1%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $89,412, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $51,370, a difference of 0.10%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $97,185, a difference of 0.68%), and per capita income ($44,595 compared to $45,066, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.2%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and family poverty (7.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.6%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.87%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.9%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (67.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 36.9%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.0%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.1%).