Czech vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,093,334 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.506. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to a decrease of 16.4 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 51.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $91,357, a difference of 13.3%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $94,466, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $52,631, a difference of 2.4%), median earnings ($47,221 compared to $45,820, a difference of 3.1%), and median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $40,958, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 73.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 57.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.48%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 47.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 47.2%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 41.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.6%), married-couple households (49.4% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 21.0%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 245.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 72.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 22.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 50.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 65.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and college, under 1 year (67.1% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.1%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.7%).