Czech vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,233,497 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 17.8 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 13.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $64,416, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $53,680, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $103,705, a difference of 0.19%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $106,453, a difference of 0.58%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $47,617, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.9%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and family poverty (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 0.74%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.9%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.6%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.2%), currently married (49.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and family households (64.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 41.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.4%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and high school diploma (91.6% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 33.4%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.69%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%).