Celtic vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Scandinavians

Average
Good
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Scandinavian Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,251,815 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.600% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 599.5 Scandinavians.
Celtic Integration in Scandinavian Communities

Celtic vs Scandinavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $52,654, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,896 compared to $102,969, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $38,306, a difference of 0.060%), per capita income ($43,621 compared to $43,848, a difference of 0.52%), and median earnings ($45,732 compared to $46,433, a difference of 1.5%).
Celtic vs Scandinavian Income
Income MetricCelticScandinavian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Average
$43,848
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Good
$104,410
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Good
$86,073
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Average
$46,433
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Good
$55,527
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Tragic
$38,306
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Good
$52,654
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Good
$95,596
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Good
$102,969
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Good
$61,586
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
29.1%

Celtic vs Scandinavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.9%).
Celtic vs Scandinavian Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticScandinavian
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.6%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Fair
20.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
9.7%

Celtic vs Scandinavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Celtic vs Scandinavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticScandinavian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%

Celtic vs Scandinavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.70%).
Celtic vs Scandinavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticScandinavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Good
83.0%

Celtic vs Scandinavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 11.9%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.87%), family households (63.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Celtic vs Scandinavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticScandinavian
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
29.8%

Celtic vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 9.0%).
Celtic vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticScandinavian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
93.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
62.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
23.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.0%

Celtic vs Scandinavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.8%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
Celtic vs Scandinavian Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticScandinavian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
67.7%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Excellent
61.0%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Good
46.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Average
1.8%

Celtic vs Scandinavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.2%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.92%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Celtic vs Scandinavian Disability
Disability MetricCelticScandinavian
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Average
23.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%