Immigrants from Singapore vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,008,567 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Immigrant from Singapore communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.607. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Singapore within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.379% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Singapore corresponds to an increase of 379.3 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($58,353 compared to $43,848, a difference of 33.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($124,429 compared to $95,596, a difference of 30.2%), and median family income ($134,818 compared to $104,410, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.60%), householder income under 25 years ($56,835 compared to $52,654, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,963 compared to $61,586, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 21.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and receiving food stamps (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.3%), male poverty (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and poverty (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 30.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.4%), divorced or separated (10.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.55%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and married-couple households (48.3% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 84.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 34.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 100.8%), professional degree (7.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 82.7%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 63.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.3% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.090%), high school diploma (91.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and 11th grade (94.2% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 43.9%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.2%).