Uruguayan vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,266,532 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.753. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.649% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 649.3 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 15.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $102,969, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $61,586, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $52,654, a difference of 0.36%), median earnings ($46,190 compared to $46,433, a difference of 0.53%), and per capita income ($44,318 compared to $43,848, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 24.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.3%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and married-couple households (45.5% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.90%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 60.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 41.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 17.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 32.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.2%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (46.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.77%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 30.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.36%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.57%).