Immigrants from Western Asia vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,193,275 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Immigrant from Western Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.420. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Asia corresponds to a decrease of 8.0 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 10.6%), median female earnings ($41,375 compared to $38,306, a difference of 8.0%), and per capita income ($46,876 compared to $43,848, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,190 compared to $52,654, a difference of 0.89%), householder income over 65 years ($62,645 compared to $61,586, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,217 compared to $102,969, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 43.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.30%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 25.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.5%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and family households (64.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 57.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 34.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 56.4%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.6%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (67.8% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.3%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.0%).