Houma vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,972,491 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.580. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.055% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 54.9 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $102,969, a difference of 42.8%), median household income ($62,575 compared to $86,073, a difference of 37.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $61,586, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $55,527, a difference of 9.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $52,654, a difference of 18.7%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $46,433, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 91.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 82.1%), and single male poverty (23.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 29.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 45.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 48.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 84.6%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 51.1%), and unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 56.4%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.8%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 63.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 62.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 47.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 91.3%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 91.2%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 85.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 57.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 13.8%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 20.4%).