Immigrants from Latvia vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,112,375 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.676. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.111% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 110.7 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $43,848, a difference of 16.1%), median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $38,306, a difference of 12.5%), and median earnings ($51,555 compared to $46,433, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $52,654, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $61,586, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $102,969, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.38%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.1%), family households with children (25.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.16%), births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (62.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 72.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 45.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 35.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 37.8%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 32.8%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.94%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.3%).