Immigrants from South Africa vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,323,099 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Immigrant from South Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Africa corresponds to an increase of 51.1 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,465 compared to $43,848, a difference of 17.4%), median male earnings ($62,899 compared to $55,527, a difference of 13.3%), and median earnings ($51,850 compared to $46,433, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,705 compared to $52,654, a difference of 1.8%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,234 compared to $61,586, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.36%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 22.4%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.72%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.0%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.63%), and births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 39.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 28.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 41.5%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.3%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.0% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.6%).