Pima vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Western Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Western Asia
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,031
SOCIAL INDEX
47.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
187th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Western Asia Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,757,470 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.410. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 25.3 Immigrants from Western Asia.
Pima vs Immigrants from Western Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $46,876, a difference of 53.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $106,217, a difference of 44.8%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $90,005, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,190, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $41,375, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $99,516, a difference of 20.2%).
Income Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Western Asia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $46,876 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $108,691 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $90,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $49,389 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $58,131 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $41,375 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Average $52,190 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $99,516 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $106,217 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Excellent $62,645 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Fair 26.3% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Western Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 97.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 97.4%), and married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 91.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 36.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 39.8%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Western Asia |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Poor 12.9% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Fair 9.3% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Fair 20.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Average 17.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Fair 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Average 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Excellent 16.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Average 11.6% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Western Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 143.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 116.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 107.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Western Asia |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 10.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Poor 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Poor 5.6% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Western Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Western Asia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Good 65.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Poor 79.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 34.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 73.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Poor 82.4% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Western Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 102.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 89.1%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.26, a difference of 15.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Western Asia |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 27.2% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Western Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.7%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Western Asia |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Poor 89.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 18.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Western Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 88.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 82.1%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 70.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.30%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.54%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Western Asia |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Tragic 95.6% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Poor 94.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Fair 93.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Average 91.2% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Good 86.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 67.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 62.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 50.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 42.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 17.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Western Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 68.0%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 4.2%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.1%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Western Asia |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Fair 17.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |