Latvian vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,958,376 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.256. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 63.8 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $46,876, a difference of 12.3%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $108,691, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $99,516, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $52,190, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $41,375, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 52.9%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 31.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.2%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.4%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (62.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 52.1%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 18.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.2%).