Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,536,437 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.054% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to a decrease of 54.4 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $58,131, a difference of 8.3%), median family income ($100,656 compared to $108,691, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $106,217, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $52,190, a difference of 0.53%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $41,375, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.14%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.3%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 21.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.59%), family households (64.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.25%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 3rd grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.37%), female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%).