Houma vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,325,426 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.434% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 433.7 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $106,217, a difference of 47.3%), wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 46.9%), and median household income ($62,575 compared to $90,005, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $58,131, a difference of 15.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $52,190, a difference of 17.7%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $49,389, a difference of 26.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 87.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 77.3%), and single female poverty (33.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 69.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 28.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 62.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 43.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 71.0%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.8%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.40%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 144.0%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 134.5%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 120.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.33%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 79.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 78.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 68.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 10.8%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 17.0%).