Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 338,050,111 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.146. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to a decrease of 10.7 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $58,131, a difference of 24.4%), per capita income ($37,766 compared to $46,876, a difference of 24.1%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $108,691, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $52,190, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $62,645, a difference of 14.9%), and median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $41,375, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 29.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 28.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.9%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.9%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 36.4%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.56%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.040%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 59.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 55.9%), and master's degree (11.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.1%).