Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,708,292 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.655. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.031% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 31.1 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $46,876, a difference of 19.0%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $58,131, a difference of 15.1%), and median earnings ($43,673 compared to $49,389, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $52,190, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $62,645, a difference of 3.6%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 16.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.1%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.59%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (28.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 50.7%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 37.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 31.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 57.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.7%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 18.6%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.23%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.5%).