Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,703,784 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.055% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 54.7 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 17.4%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $46,876, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $52,190, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $41,375, a difference of 0.68%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $106,217, a difference of 0.69%), and median family income ($106,544 compared to $108,691, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 21.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.47%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.0%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 62.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 41.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 41.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.6%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.6%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.9%).