Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,612,976 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.308. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 9.4 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $99,516, a difference of 20.1%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $90,005, a difference of 17.0%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $108,691, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.54%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $52,190, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $62,645, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 26.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 25.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.1%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.96%), and family households (65.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.5%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.040%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.8%).