French Canadian vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 381,583,084 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 12.8 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $46,876, a difference of 9.0%), median household income ($82,810 compared to $90,005, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $62,645, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $52,190, a difference of 0.92%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $99,516, a difference of 6.2%), and median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $58,131, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 40.3%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.5%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 25.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 26.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.61%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 40.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.3%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 34.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.67%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 69.9%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 33.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.2%).