Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,230,632 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to a decrease of 32.1 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,495 compared to $46,876, a difference of 13.0%), median family income ($97,958 compared to $108,691, a difference of 11.0%), and median male earnings ($53,704 compared to $58,131, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income over 65 years ($59,934 compared to $62,645, a difference of 4.5%), and median female earnings ($39,376 compared to $41,375, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 20.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.9%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.44%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.4%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.0%), currently married (47.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 58.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 43.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 87.0%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 75.6%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.0%).