Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,258,383 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.442. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.073% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 72.9 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $46,876, a difference of 23.8%), median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $58,131, a difference of 18.2%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $108,691, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $52,190, a difference of 4.3%), householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $62,645, a difference of 10.4%), and wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and single female poverty (22.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.9%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.8%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 35.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 66.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 63.3%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 24.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.9%).