Immigrants from Ghana vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,661,696 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.806. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.326% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to an increase of 326.4 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,131 compared to $46,929, a difference of 14.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $98,849, a difference of 12.6%), and median male earnings ($51,836 compared to $57,941, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income over 65 years ($58,624 compared to $56,331, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,982 compared to $100,523, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 15.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty (15.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 21.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.3%), and births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 60.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 42.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 13.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 34.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.4%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 19.2%), and bachelor's degree (36.9% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 43.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.34%), disability (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 3.0%).