Latvian vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,831,540 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.067% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 66.9 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 22.5%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $56,331, a difference of 19.5%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $103,197, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $43,363, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $54,846, a difference of 3.9%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $50,151, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 70.3%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 56.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.3%), single female poverty (19.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 33.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 172.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 68.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 23.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 48.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 60.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 67.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.0%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 54.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.12%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.1%).