Central American vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,292,308 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,560 compared to $46,929, a difference of 21.7%), median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $57,941, a difference of 20.5%), and median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $43,363, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,321 compared to $56,331, a difference of 0.020%), wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $54,846, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 21.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 19.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.90%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 57.3%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 42.4%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 3.3%), family households (66.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.24, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 146.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 96.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 70.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 21.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 44.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 70.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 46.5%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 44.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 38.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.0%).