Pima vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,379,667 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 88.2 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $46,929, a difference of 53.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $100,523, a difference of 37.0%), and median male earnings ($42,357 compared to $57,941, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,846, a difference of 6.5%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $56,331, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 95.7%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 83.2%), and single male poverty (20.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 31.9%), and receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 32.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 142.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 134.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 114.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 130.1%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 99.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.24, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 116.9%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 88.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 83.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 17.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 37.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 83.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 93.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 84.3%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 66.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 69.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 60.5%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 13.5%).