Celtic vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,925,553 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.949. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.405% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 405.1 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.9%), median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $43,363, a difference of 13.3%), and median earnings ($45,732 compared to $50,151, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,896 compared to $100,523, a difference of 1.7%), median family income ($101,139 compared to $103,197, a difference of 2.0%), and median household income ($83,193 compared to $86,425, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 50.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 42.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.59%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 41.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 29.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.3%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.41%), family households (63.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 230.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 95.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 80.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 25.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 56.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 80.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.3%), master's degree (14.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.1%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (65.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.28%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 97.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 38.0%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.1%).