Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,804,541 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.525. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $56,331, a difference of 26.1%), per capita income ($41,017 compared to $46,929, a difference of 14.4%), and median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $43,363, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $54,846, a difference of 0.57%), median family income ($104,910 compared to $103,197, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $98,849, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 64.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 49.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.8%), single female poverty (19.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 28.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.5%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 33.0%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 246.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 158.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 108.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 26.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 62.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 108.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 63.2%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 45.6%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 58.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.3%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.31%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.3%).