Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,232,951 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 8.9 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $57,941, a difference of 14.8%), per capita income ($41,195 compared to $46,929, a difference of 13.9%), and median earnings ($44,462 compared to $50,151, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $54,846, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $56,331, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 15.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.28%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.9%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 30.8%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 16.7%), no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.7%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.0%), and master's degree (13.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 31.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.76%), disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.9%).