Portuguese vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,905,342 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.811. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 50.4 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.3%), householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $56,331, a difference of 9.1%), and median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $43,363, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $98,849, a difference of 0.59%), householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $54,846, a difference of 0.75%), and median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $57,941, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 44.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 37.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.87%), single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 44.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 37.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.2%), births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 31.1%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.92%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 211.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 104.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 82.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 24.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 54.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 82.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 28.2%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.4%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.33%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and ged/equivalency (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 90.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.6%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 3.1%).