Belizean vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,636,269 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Belizean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belizeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.471% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belizeans corresponds to an increase of 470.7 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,097 compared to $46,929, a difference of 20.0%), median male earnings ($48,358 compared to $57,941, a difference of 19.8%), and median earnings ($42,702 compared to $50,151, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,580 compared to $56,331, a difference of 3.2%), wage/income gap (21.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,094 compared to $54,846, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 19.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 43.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.4%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.39 compared to 3.24, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 86.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 73.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 16.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.0% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 34.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 54.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 45.1%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 43.9%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.42%), nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 37.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.5%).