Immigrants from Caribbean vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,957,664 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.277. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 3.5 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,254 compared to $46,929, a difference of 26.0%), median male earnings ($46,193 compared to $57,941, a difference of 25.4%), and median family income ($83,319 compared to $103,197, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $54,846, a difference of 8.1%), wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $56,331, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 37.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 25.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.45%), single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and single female poverty (22.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.79%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 54.4%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 43.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (65.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 35.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 22.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 9.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.7%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 48.0%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 37.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.2%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.7%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.2%).