Ethiopian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,930,726 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 5.4 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 24.0%), median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $36,034, a difference of 20.0%), and median household income ($89,640 compared to $75,240, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $50,292, a difference of 11.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $84,461, a difference of 14.6%), and median earnings ($49,572 compared to $42,651, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 47.5%), single father poverty (13.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 40.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 39.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.9%), married-couple households (43.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 27.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.8%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 43.0%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.060%), high school diploma (89.0% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 60.2%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 53.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.96%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.8%).