Alsatian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,852,801 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.804. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.257% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 2,257.4 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,284 compared to $39,568, a difference of 19.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,435 compared to $88,390, a difference of 13.6%), and median household income ($85,053 compared to $75,240, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $45,764, a difference of 7.6%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and median male earnings ($55,380 compared to $50,292, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and single male poverty (15.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 0.29%), male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and single female poverty (24.5% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 45.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 33.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.3%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and family households with children (25.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.2%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (61.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 51.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.8%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 34.3%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.0%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 31.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.58%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.6%).