Uruguayan vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,952,549 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 5.7 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $45,764, a difference of 14.6%), median household income ($84,691 compared to $75,240, a difference of 12.6%), and per capita income ($44,318 compared to $39,568, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $55,677, a difference of 6.1%), median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $50,292, a difference of 6.7%), and wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 37.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 30.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.70%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 8.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.15%), family households (64.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 38.0%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 29.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 47.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.7%).