Asian vs Osage Community Comparison
COMPARE
Asian
Osage
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Asians
Osage
8,712
SOCIAL INDEX
84.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
56th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Osage Integration in Asian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,624,943 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.296. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Osage.
Asian vs Osage Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($101,681 compared to $75,240, a difference of 35.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $88,390, a difference of 34.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $84,461, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.50%), householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $55,677, a difference of 23.6%), and median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $36,034, a difference of 23.7%).
Income Metric | Asian | Osage |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,057 | Tragic $39,568 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $119,955 | Tragic $91,926 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $101,681 | Tragic $75,240 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,690 | Tragic $42,651 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,827 | Tragic $50,292 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,586 | Tragic $36,034 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,003 | Tragic $45,764 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $112,666 | Tragic $84,461 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $118,426 | Tragic $88,390 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $68,822 | Tragic $55,677 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 27.1% |
Asian vs Osage Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 47.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.9%).
Poverty Metric | Asian | Osage |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 9.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.2% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 24.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.0% | Tragic 32.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Excellent 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Average 11.7% |
Asian vs Osage Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 42.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Asian | Osage |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Good 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Asian vs Osage Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Asian | Osage |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 63.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 78.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 39.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 80.6% |
Asian vs Osage Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 26.5%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 19.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (66.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 4.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Asian | Osage |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Tragic 63.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.1% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.5% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.28 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Average 6.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Excellent 47.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.8% | Fair 32.1% |
Asian vs Osage Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.34%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Asian | Osage |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.1% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.0% | Exceptional 58.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.8% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Asian vs Osage Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 48.9%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 46.8%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.25%), high school diploma (89.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
Education Level Metric | Asian | Osage |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Average 92.5% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.4% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.4% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.7% | Tragic 84.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.4% | Tragic 62.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 55.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.1% | Tragic 41.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.4% | Tragic 33.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.7% |
Asian vs Osage Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 68.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 54.4%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.0%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.2%).
Disability Metric | Asian | Osage |
Disability | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 14.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Tragic 27.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.9% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |