Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,779,076 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 69.0 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Osage communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $39,568, a difference of 19.8%), median household income ($89,496 compared to $75,240, a difference of 19.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $88,390, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $45,764, a difference of 13.4%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $50,292, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 30.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 30.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.39%), family households (63.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 18.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.5%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 38.8%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 51.7%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 38.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.9%).