Indonesian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,622,060 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Indonesian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.770. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indonesians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indonesians corresponds to an increase of 71.6 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 19.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,543 compared to $84,461, a difference of 6.2%), and per capita income ($37,300 compared to $39,568, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,140 compared to $36,034, a difference of 0.29%), householder income under 25 years ($45,566 compared to $45,764, a difference of 0.43%), and median earnings ($41,701 compared to $42,651, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.16%), single female poverty (24.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and single mother poverty (32.4% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.7% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.7%), married-couple households (42.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and currently married (43.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (61.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 24.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 82.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and high school diploma (86.5% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.58%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and associate's degree (41.9% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.7%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 36.7%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.4%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.3%).