Marshallese vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 8,151,430 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Marshallese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.532. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Marshallese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Marshallese corresponds to an increase of 37.3 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,874 compared to $55,677, a difference of 18.3%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,627 compared to $45,764, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,575 compared to $84,461, a difference of 1.1%), per capita income ($39,108 compared to $39,568, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($36,459 compared to $36,034, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.13%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 42.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 12.1%), births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and average family size (3.38 compared to 3.18, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.0%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.9% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.7%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.8% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 0.010%), ged/equivalency (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 95.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 16.9%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.3%).