Brazilian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,661,874 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.980. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.099% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 98.8 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $45,764, a difference of 18.7%), median household income ($88,934 compared to $75,240, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $88,390, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $55,677, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $36,034, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 40.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 31.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.16%), and family households (63.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 30.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.9%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 31.7%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 41.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 38.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.1%).