Alaska Native vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,118,457 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.308. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to a decrease of 16.4 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $45,764, a difference of 18.0%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $55,677, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,558 compared to $39,568, a difference of 0.020%), median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $50,292, a difference of 1.2%), and median earnings ($43,750 compared to $42,651, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Osage communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 33.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.22%), male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and female poverty (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 65.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 53.2%), and male unemployment (8.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.6%), births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 19.4%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.1%), married-couple households (45.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 100.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 15.2%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and 4th grade (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 61.0%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and female disability (12.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.8%).