Armenian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,831,429 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Armenian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Armenians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Armenians corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Armenian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,248 compared to $84,461, a difference of 22.2%), per capita income ($48,287 compared to $39,568, a difference of 22.0%), and median household income ($91,807 compared to $75,240, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 9.2%), householder income over 65 years ($61,656 compared to $55,677, a difference of 10.7%), and median male earnings ($58,134 compared to $50,292, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Armenian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 36.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 34.8%), and single female poverty (18.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and poverty (12.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Armenian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Armenian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Armenian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 22.5%), births to unmarried women (26.2% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 22.3%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.10%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.96%), and currently married (46.8% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Armenian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.3%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 40.0%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.48%), high school diploma (88.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 77.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 46.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.47%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 11.4%).