Chickasaw vs Osage Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Osage
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Osage
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Osage Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,218,951 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 12.8 Osage.
Chickasaw vs Osage Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $39,568, a difference of 8.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $84,461, a difference of 8.4%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $91,926, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.36%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $45,764, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $55,677, a difference of 3.6%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Osage |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $39,568 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $91,926 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $75,240 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $42,651 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $50,292 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $36,034 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $45,764 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $84,461 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $88,390 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $55,677 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.1% |
Chickasaw vs Osage Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 11.8%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 0.090%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.91%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Osage |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 9.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 16.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 24.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 32.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Excellent 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Average 11.7% |
Chickasaw vs Osage Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Osage |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Good 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chickasaw vs Osage Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Osage |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 39.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.6% |
Chickasaw vs Osage Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 13.2%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.31%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Osage |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Average 6.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Excellent 47.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Fair 32.1% |
Chickasaw vs Osage Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 0.36%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Osage |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 58.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Chickasaw vs Osage Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Osage |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 62.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 55.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 41.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 33.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Chickasaw vs Osage Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.5%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.9%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Osage |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 27.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |