Argentinean vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,665,715 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.389. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 36.4 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $39,568, a difference of 26.0%), median household income ($93,960 compared to $75,240, a difference of 24.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $88,390, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.29%), median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $36,034, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $55,677, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 38.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 33.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.1%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 31.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.3%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), currently married (47.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 60.2%), master's degree (18.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 44.7%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 54.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.6%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.0%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.3%).